Skip to main content

Master of Public Health

Physician Patient Sharing Relationships within Insurance Plan Networks

AUTHORS

Graves JA , Lee D , Leszinsky L , Nshuti L , Nikpay S , Richards M , Buntin MB , Polsky D , . Health services research. 2023 2 3; ().

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To quantify shared patient relationships between primary care physicians (PCPs) and cardiologists and oncologists and the degree to which those relationships were captured within insurance networks.

DATA SOURCES: Secondary analysis of Vericred data on physician networks, CareSet data on physicians’ shared Medicare patients, and insurance plan attributes from Health Insurance Compare. Data validation exercises used data from Physician Compare and IQVIA.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of the PCP-to-specialist in-network shared patient percentage (primary outcome). We also categorized networks by insurance market segment (Medicare Advantage, Medicaid managed care, small-group or individually purchased), insurance plan type, and network breadth.

DATA EXTRACTION: We analyzed data on 219,982 PCPs, 29,400 cardiologists, and 22,745 oncologists who, in 2021, accepted Medicare Advantage (n=941 networks), Medicaid managed care (n=293), and individually-purchased (n=332) and small-group (n=501) plans PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Networks captured, on average, 64.6% of PCP-cardiology shared patient ties, and 61.8% of PCP-oncologist ties. Less than half of in-network ties (44.5% and 38.9%, respectively) were among physicians with a common organizational affiliation. After adjustment for network breadth, we found no evidence of differences in the shared patient percentage across insurance market segments or networks of different types (p-value>0.05 for all comparisons). An exception was among national vs. local and regional networks, where we found that national plans captured fewer shared patient ties, particularly among the narrowest networks (58.4% for national networks vs. 64.7% for local and regional networks for PCP-cardiology).

CONCLUSIONS: Given recent trends towards narrower networks, our findings underscore the importance of incorporating additional and nuanced measures of network composition to aid plan selection (for patients) and to guide regulatory oversight. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Tags: