Skip to main content

Master of Public Health

Oncology Providers' and Professionals' Experiences With Suicide Risk Screening Among Patients With Head and Neck Cancer: A Qualitative Study

AUTHORS

Turner K , Stover AM , Tometich DB , Geiss C , Mason A , Nguyen OT , Hume E , McCormick R , Powell S , Hallanger-Johnson J , Patel KB , Kirtane KS , Jammigumpula N , Moore C , Perkins R , Rollison DE , Jim HSL , Oswald LB , Crowder S , Gonzalez BD , Robinson E , Tabriz AA , Islam JY , Gilbert SM , . JCO oncology practice. 2022 11 17; (). OP2200433

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: There has been limited study of the implementation of suicide risk screening for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) as a part of routine care. To address this gap, this study assessed oncology providers’ and professionals’ perspectives about barriers and facilitators of implementing a suicide risk screening among patients with HNC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with HNC with an in-person visit completed a suicide risk screening on an electronic tablet. Patients reporting passive death wish were then screened for active suicidal ideation and referred for appropriate intervention. Interviews were conducted with 25 oncology providers and professionals who played a key role in implementation including nurses, medical assistants, patient access representatives, advanced practice providers, physicians, social workers, and informatics staff. The interview guide was based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed for themes.

RESULTS: Participants identified multilevel implementation barriers, such as intervention level (eg, patient difficulty with using a tablet), process level (eg, limited nursing engagement), organizational level (eg, limited clinic Wi-Fi connectivity), and individual level (eg, low clinician self-efficacy for interpreting and acting upon patient-reported outcome scores). Participants noted facilitators, such as effective care coordination across nursing and social work staff and the opportunity for patients to be screened multiple times. Participants recommended strengthening patient and clinician education and providing patients with other modalities for data entry (eg, desktop computer in the waiting room).

CONCLUSION: Participants identified important intervention modifications that may be needed to optimize suicide risk screening in cancer care settings.

Tags: