Skip to main content

Master of Public Health

Revision Dual Mobility Constructs with Unmatched Acetabular and Femoral Components Do Not Increase Failure Rate

AUTHORS

Warwick H , Kwong JW , Namiri NK , Kayupov E , Maher P , Hansen EN , . The Journal of arthroplasty. 2023 10 30; ().

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Dual mobility (DM) constructs for revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) have continued to grow in popularity to mitigate instability. This benefit comes at the cost of potential unique modes of failure, and there are theoretical concerns that combining femoral and acetabular components from different manufacturers could lead to increased failure rates. We aimed to investigate rates of reoperation between matched and unmatched DM implants used in revision THA.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 217 revision THAs performed with DM constructs between July 2012 and September 2021 at a single institution. DM constructs were classified as “matched” if the acetabular and femoral components were manufactured by the same company. They were classified as “unmatched” if the acetabular and femoral components were manufactured by different companies. The primary outcome was reoperation for any reason.

RESULTS: There were 136 matched DM constructs and 81 unmatched constructs. Average follow-up was 4.6 years (range, 2.0 to 9.6 years). There was no difference in reoperation rate between matched and unmatched groups (11.0 versus 13.6%, P=0.576). The most common reasons for reoperation in both groups were instability and periprosthetic joint infection. There was one revision for intra-prosthetic dislocation in the matched group.

CONCLUSION: The use of unmatched DM components in revision THA was common and did not increase the risk of reoperation at an average of 4.6 year follow up. This information can be helpful in operative planning, but further research on long-term survival will be necessary.

Tags: