Innovation Resources

This guide was assembled by Chuck Sanders, with much input from Vanderbilt Center for Technology Transfer and Commercialization officers Alan Bentley and Mike Villalobos.

Document the conceptualization and development of your "matter" in writing (e.g., a lab notebook) or some other medium. While generally no longer required in the U.S., it remains a good idea to date and sign such documentation.

As soon as your matter is developed in conceptual detail and/or actually fleshed out in tangible form ("reduced to practice"), file a disclosure with the Vanderbilt Center for Technology Transfer and Commercialization. There are four types of disclosure forms: one for patentable innovations, one for software/apps, one for content (written document, music, video, etc.), and one for biological materials. If in doubt about whether to file a disclosure or what type of disclosure to file, just contact the CTTC via email. They will be most happy to advise you.

The CTTC will work with you to determine if a patent application, copyright application, or other form of protection is appropriate. If so, they will work with you to prepare and submit such applications. There is no expense to you for filing such applications.

• You can discuss with and present your matter to other VU/VUMC personnel, although they should be aware of the imperative to not broadcast information on the matter beyond the Vanderbilt community.
• Avoid discussing, publishing, and/or presenting your matter in significant detail to non‐VU/VUMC personnel or media (journals, non‐VU/VUMC presentations, web sites, dissertations, etc.) before it is protected unless covered by a formal confidentiality agreement. In the case of a Ph.D. dissertation, it is possible to write, defend, and submit the completed dissertation, but place a hold on its public release until a patent application (or an application for some other form of protection) is submitted.
• Just because you have discussed your matter with someone outside of VU/VUMC does not mean that you cannot file a disclosure with the CTTC. In most cases, the level of such discussion will not be an "enabling disclosure." However, discussion providing key details that would allow someone to replicate your work (an enabling disclosure) would be a problem. Public disclosure of "enabling" information may cause forfeiture of rights in most non‐U.S. jurisdictions, although a one‐year grace period exists in the U.S.
• When in doubt, contact the CTTC.

• The inventor is the person (or persons) who originally conceived the matter, but this can also include (as co‐inventors) those who contributed by conceptualizing the enabling innovations required to "reduce to practice" the overall invention. Disclosures can be co‐authored.
• If a student, other trainee, or staff member was involved in the conceptualization of the project, then they should be listed as a co‐inventor.
• It is OK to involve students, other trainees, and staff in the development of a protectable matter that you have conceived. Participation in development does not confer co‐inventor status. However, the involvement of students or others in development should be reported when you file a disclosure. When relevant, students and postdocs should be made aware that they are working on a project for which the faculty advisor plans to seek IP protection because publication of their results from this project could be delayed until a patent application is filed (see below).
• If students, trainees, and/or staff are involved in the development of your matter, do not worry that your life will suddenly involve a complicated web of conflict of interest disclosures and oversight. COI issues will usually be minimal, at least until your matter is either licensed and/or results in formation of a company in which you hold equity.
• If your matter was co‐conceived by you and non‐VU personnel (e.g., faculty at another university) and/or if your matter has relied on components (e.g., reagents) that came to you from outside of the university, you can still file a disclosure but should declare all outside involvement.
• Ultimately, the CTTC will work with you to determine whether any others beside you merit "inventor" status and/or may have a legal right to a share of commercial revenues. A patent attorney will comprehensively assess all contributions and ensure that the inventor list is correct.

• Once a first patent application has been filed, it is OK to submit a paper on your matter for publication. Patents may be able to be filed after paper submission, but the timeline for filing is compressed as patent rights outside of the U.S. are no longer available if publication occurs before a patent application is filed.
• The time period between disclosure and decision about a patent application is often short (i.e., a few weeks) and can be expedited if needed. Accordingly, disclosure and applications for protection often do not result in major delays of publications and presentations. However, one possible outcome is that your disclosed project is deemed to be on the path to being viable for a patent application, but not until backed up by additional results that will take time and effort to procure and submit for consideration by the CTTC.
• It is OK if your matter is directly related to research being supported by existing or proposed federal grants. It is the university's responsibility to facilitate commercial development stemming from federally supported research (Bayh‐Dole Act), and they are well prepared to assist you with the disclosure of inventions and other matter to funding agencies as a standard component of grants reporting. Federal statutes require universities to protect, commercialize, and report to the government funding agency any inventions made using government funding.

• The cost of disclosure and subsequent applications for patent or copyright protection is covered by the CTTC. All effort and legal fees associated with marketing, licensing, and enforcing intellectual property rights are also university expenses.
• As the initiator/inventor of protected matter, you are entitled to receive a significant fraction of any income generated by the licensed use or sale of or by any other transaction involving your matter. Indeed, Vanderbilt has a very generous policy regarding royalties, sharing nearly half of licensing income with the inventors.

• Sometimes the university reviews an invention disclosure but decides not to file a patent application. In this case you are free to pursue intellectual property rights on your own by working with experts outside of the university (e.g., with a patent law firm). In this case you will have to pay the various associated fees. There is a Vanderbilt "return of rights policy" for such cases.

• You will need to work out a license to any intellectual property rights with the CTTC. To facilitate the process, the CTTC has developed a start‐up license agreement that they will review with you.
• The CTTC can help with company formation if necessary, and can help identify investors, executives, and advisors that can help the company launch and grow. More information on startup support can be found on the CTTC website.
• The Wond'ry, Vanderbilt's Innovation Center, has a plethora of resources to help build and test new company concepts.
• The Office of Conflict of Interest Management can provide guidance and help build and approve a conflicts management plan to address the time and effort you and (possibly) members of your lab commit to the new company.

• The government does not have a claim to revenue, but does have a claim to a free license to the invention for government purposes alone. When the CTTC gets a disclosure that indicates that government funds have been used, it is reported to the government agency funding the research. There are then many follow-ups with the government agency to ensure that the CTTC fulfills the following government compliance obligations:
  • Issuing a free government license.
  • Formally claiming ownership of the invention.
  • Reporting on all patenting activities.
  • Reporting the decision not to pursue patenting.
  • Reporting all licensing efforts and all revenues that Vanderbilt receives.
• For the most part, government reporting falls to the CTTC (see above), where CTTC reporting needs to match whatever the inventor happens to report on their progress reports and closeout reports to the agency funders. It is not more complicated for inventors to file a patent for an invention that was government funded, it is just critically important for the CTTC to add a sentence acknowledging government sponsorship of the work at the beginning of the patent.